The Zenda Vendetta by Simon Hawke

The Zenda Vendetta
by Simon Hawke
Pages: 210
Date: August 19 2014 (originally 1985)
Publisher:
Series: TimeWars (4th in series)

Review
Rating: 4.0 out of 5.0
Read: April 5 to 6 2016

The 20th book I know I've read by Hawke.

The gang's back, this time with the direct involvement of their boss, Moses Forrester. It appears that Forrester did some 'naughty' stuff on his first mission, which resulted in a kid (don't worry; this comes up immediately in the book). The kid, who now looks about 30 but is actually 79, and an old flame of Forrester's decide on some payback. Oh, and they are the last members of TimeKeepers still around, so there's that as well.

As I mentioned in my last review, the TimeWars, at least up to then, and this book, does not relate to warring times or the like. But to one time that decides to settle their disputes by inserting members of 27th century military personal back in time. During conflicts. And 'judge' the results. I mention this issue because it's mentioned several times in this book. It's the purpose behind TimeKeepers. They are like Green Peace - in that Green Peace has been known to ram whaling boats to stop the people on the boats from whaling. Well, TimeKeepers fuck with time to try to show that fighting wars back in time is super stupid. As any sane person would know without having to have them involved (hell, the guy who invented the devices that allow time travel knew it, got insane over it, and killed himself over it).

So, in this specific instance, a specific person is about to be crowned king in some made up country in Central Europe in 1891. That country being a ‘vest pocket’ kingdom named ‘Ruritania’. Which is both a fictional country, and something that popped up in real, fiction, books way back when. The TimeKeepers, in the form of this really super hot chick, and Forrester’s son, are attempting to both disrupt this crowning moment, while also kill Andre Cross, Lucas Priest, and Finn Delaney. They’d like to get Forrester to, though he is desk bound now-a-days so that’s unlikely (ha, send him a letter, he’ll travel in time).

I’d mentioned before, in another review, that I liked how Hawke combined real world history with a science fiction/time travel story. Though I didn’t specifically like the ‘good guys’. Well, that mostly continues in this book. Mostly because the ‘bad guys’ side seems more reasonable than whatever weird thing the ‘good guys’ are fighting for. It’s vaguely annoying that I kind of entered this series a while back (as in the 1980s, 1990s) with this idea that the TimeWars people were working to protect time. To keep it from destabilizing. Annoying because, while that is true, for the most part they are making ‘adjustment’s that they wouldn’t have to be making if they weren’t fucking back in time to begin with. But, whatever.

I entered this book somewhat reluctantly because I knew, unlike past books, this one would be fiction set in . . . fiction. As in, instead of the story set against ‘stuff’ that really happened back in time, the story is set against. . well, the idea of something that could have happened back in time. Sure, Ruritania popped up in a set of books released in the late 1890s, but it’s still a fictional country. And sure, the last book by Hawke, the Pimpernel Plot one, involved a fictional character as the back story (from a play from something like 1905), but it still had as it’s backing the real French Revolution (hmm, and heh, I just learned that one of the main villains in that book, Chauvelin, actually is based on a real person who actually lived through the time and was an officer under Napoleon. Unlike how the book just tossed out something like ‘it doesn’t matter that he died, he was going to die in a year anyway’).

As happens, I distracted myself.

I was reluctant to begin this book because it seemed to be veering away from one of the things I liked about the series (time travels working and acting in a real world historical setting). But I did begin the book, and I found it actually quite entertaining. It was ‘good enough’. I’d give it around a 3.7 or 3.8 rating.

April 7 2016